vagueness as indecision
This paper motivates and explores an expressivist theory of vagueness, modeled on Allan Gibbard’s (2003) normative expressivism. It shows how Chris Kennedy’s (2007) semantics for gradable adjectives can be adjusted to fit into a theory on Gibbardian lines, where assertions constrain not just possible worlds but plans for action. Vagueness, on this account, is literally indecision about where to draw lines. It is argued that the distinctive phenomena of vagueness, such as the intuition of tolerance, can be explained in terms of practical constraints on plans, and that the expressivist view captures what is right about several contending theories of vagueness.
John MacFarlane is Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. He has worked on a wide variety of topics in the history of philosophy, epistemology, the philosophy of logic and mathematics, and the philosophy of language. He is the author of Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications (OUP, 2014).
vagueness as indecision
Paint being red is one thing; it is another for a person to treat paint as red for some practical purpose. The first is a matter of the paint and its properties; the second involves activity: placing the pot on a particular shelf, fetching it in response to verbal instructions,etc.
This essay explores the thesis that for vague predicates uncertainty over whether a borderline instance x of red/large/tall/good is to be understood as practical uncertainty over whether to treat x as red/large/tall/good. Expressivist/quasi-realist treatments of vague predicates due to John MacFarlane and Daniel Elstein provide the stalking horse. Section 1 introduces a question about our attitudes to borderline cases of vague predicates F. Section 2 explores the actions of treating and/or counting a thing as F. Section 3 reviews how we might share our practical plans to count-as-F and evaluate those plans. Section 4 looks at the shapes that the best plans to count-as-F may take. Section 5 links these practical evaluations to the cognitive evaluations of doxastic attitudes to vague predications. Sections 6 and 7 concern puzzles for the approach suggested here. Section 6 explores its treatment of normatively defective or contested terms, and section 7 raises a puzzle about the mechanics of MacFarlane’s detailed implementation of the approach in connection to gradable adjectives.
Robert Williams is Professor of Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Leeds. He joined Leeds in 2005, after graduate work in Oxford and St Andrews. His areas of research include logic and rationality, conditionals and conditional thinking, and the metaphysics of mind and language. He is currently engaged in writing two monographs, one on the nature of representation and another on indeterminacy, the former supported by an ERC research grant.
8 - 10 July 2016
School of English, Communication and Philosophy
John Percival Building
Cardiff CF10 3EU
future joint sessions
2017 joint session:
7 - 9 july 2017
2018 joint session:
2019 joint session:
Visit our Future Joint Sessions page for further information.
The inaugural address and symposia for the Joint Session are published in the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, which is published digitally and in hardcover every June. The Supplementary Volume is sent to subscribing members of the Society in categories 4 and 5.
Members in other categories can purchase the hardcover Supplementary Volume from the Online Shop. Volumes will also be available at the registration desk during the conference.
The hardcover volume is printed in black on an 80gsm white book wove stock accredited by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). Binding is in dark blue Arbelave Library Buckram over 2500 micron boards blocked in gold on the spine. This makes for a strong, attractive and durable book with a scuff resistant and wipeable cover.
2015 joint session:
10 - 12 july 2015
2014 joint session:
11 - 13 july 2014
2013 joint session:
12 - 14 july 2013
Subscribing members receive online access to the Proceedings from 2000 to the most current issue.
Subscribing members also receive the bound, hardcover volume of the latest Proceedings through the post.